Explaining the nonuniform motions of the five planets was one
of the main challenges facing the astronomers of antiquity. The
Greeks developed many theories to account for retrograde motion
and the loops that the planets trace out against the background
stars. One of the most successful and enduring models was originated
by Apollonius of Perga and by Hipparchus in the second
century B.C. and expanded upon by Ptolemy, the last of the great
Greek astronomers, during the second century A.D.
sketches the basic concept, usually called the Ptolemaic system.
Each planet is assumed to move in a small circle called an epicycle,
whose center in turn moves in a larger circle, called a deferent,
which is centered approximately on the Earth. Both the
epicycle and deferent rotate in the same direction
As viewed from Earth, the epicycle moves eastward along the
deferent. Most of the time the eastward motion of the planet on
its epicycle adds to the eastward motion of the epicycle on the
deferent . Then the planet is seen to be in direct
(eastward) motion against the background stars. However, when
the planet is on the part of its epicycle nearest Earth, the motion
of the planet along the epicycle is opposite to the motion of the
epicycle along the deferent. The planet therefore appears to slow
down and halt its usual eastward movement among the constellations,
and actually goes backward in retrograde (westward) motion
for a few weeks or months. Thus, the concept
of epicycles and deferents enabled Greek astronomers to explain
the retrograde loops of the planets.
Using the wealth of astronomical data in the library at Alexandria,
including records of planetary positions for hundreds of
years, Ptolemy deduced the sizes and rotation rates of the epicycles
and deferents needed to reproduce the recorded paths of the
planets. After years of tedious work, Ptolemy assembled his calculations
into 13 volumes, collectively called the Almagest. His
work was used to predict the positions and paths of the Sun,
Moon, and planets with unprecedented accuracy. In fact, the Almagest
was so successful that it became the astronomer’s bible,
and for more than 1000 years, the Ptolemaic system endured as
a useful description of the workings of the heavens.
Comments
Post a Comment