Skip to main content

Lorentz transformation



Lorentz transformation and its inverse:





Define an event to have spacetime coordinates (t,x,y,z) in system S and (t′,x′,y′,z′) in a reference frame moving at a velocity v with respect to that frame, S′. Then the Lorentz transformation specifies that these coordinates are related in the following way:
where
is the Lorentz factor and c is the speed of light in vacuum, and the velocity v of S′, relative to S, is parallel to the x-axis. For simplicity, the y and z coordinates are unaffected; only the x and t coordinates are transformed. These Lorentz transformations form a one-parameter group of linear mappings, that parameter being called rapidity.
Solving the four transformation equations above for the unprimed coordinates yields the inverse Lorentz transformation:
Enforcing this inverse Lorentz transformation to coincide with the Lorentz transformation from the primed to the unprimed system, shows the unprimed frame as moving with the velocity v′ = −v, as measured in the primed frame.
There is nothing special about the x-axis. The transformation can apply to the y- or z-axis, or indeed in any direction parallel to the motion (which are warped by the γ factor) and perpendicular; see the article Lorentz transformation for details.
A quantity invariant under Lorentz transformations is known as a Lorentz scalar.
Writing the Lorentz transformation and its inverse in terms of coordinate differences, where one event has coordinates (x1t1) and (x1t1), another event has coordinates (x2t2and (x2t2), and the differences are defined as
Eq. 1:    
Eq. 2:    
we get
Eq. 3:     
Eq. 4:     
If we take differentials instead of taking differences, we get
Eq. 5:     
Eq. 6:     


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Ptolemaic System

Explaining the nonuniform motions of the five planets was one of the main challenges facing the astronomers of antiquity. The Greeks developed many theories to account for retrograde motion and the loops that the planets trace out against the background stars. One of the most successful and enduring models was originated by Apollonius of Perga and by Hipparchus in the second century B.C. and expanded upon by Ptolemy, the last of the great Greek astronomers, during the second century A.D.  sketches the basic concept, usually called the Ptolemaic system. Each planet is assumed to move in a small circle called an epicycle, whose center in turn moves in a larger circle, called a deferent, which is centered approximately on the Earth. Both the epicycle and deferent rotate in the same direction As viewed from Earth, the epicycle moves eastward along the deferent. Most of the time the eastward motion of the planet on its epicycle adds to th...

Copernicus and the Arrangement of the Planets

In the years after 1500, Copernicus came to realize that a heliocentric model has several advantages beyond providing a natural explanation of retrograde motion. In the Ptolemaic system, the arrangement of the planets—that is, which are close to the Earth and which are far away—was chosen in large part by guesswork. But using a heliocentric model, Copernicus could determine the arrangement of the planets without ambiguity. Copernicus realized that because Mercury and Venus are always observed fairly near the Sun in the sky, their orbits must be smaller than the Earth’s. Planets in such orbits are called inferior planets. The other visible planets—Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn—are sometimes seen on the side of the celestial sphere opposite the Sun, so these planets appear high above the horizon at midnight (when the Sun is far below the horizon). When this happens, the Earth must lie between the Sun and these planets. Copernicus therefore conclude...